38.
but two of the Justices holding their official Appointments, upon being asked to attend at the hearing of the very cases named in the Memorandum, declined plea of pressing business included in the Commission.
His Excellency is requested to state in the Memorandum that certain of the Justices on the 23th of May, concurred with the retiring Chief Magistrate "by which, in the judgment of His Excellency, the obvious intent and meaning of the Law were abrogated and annulled by the action of the Bench" that again, on the 2nd of June, certain of the Justices "Supported the retiring Chief Magistrate in his determination not to give effect to the Law," and "cooperated with him in his extraordinary course of proceeding":
Those statements not question that plea, but we submit that the conduct of the Official Justices, in this particular, contrasts favourably with that of their official brethren. & if be suggested to these remarks that the nature of their offices prevents the officials from attending at Sessions we should be glad to be informed for what purpose, different from the others, they were included in a decision.
38.
but two of the Justices holding ther fficial Aucointments, upon being acken to attend at the rearing of
ne
F
the very cares named in the
very Memorandum, declined
slea of pre
of
Messing business
included in the Commission.
His reliency is ricased to
3
207
state in the Memorandum that certain of the Justices on the 23th of
with the reting
ff
upon the
May
A
مد
not question that slen, but we
submit that the conduct of the
4th-
Official
Justices, in this
particular, contracts fromably with that of their official brettern. & it be soucted to there remarks that the nature of their offices vevents the officiat from attending at Seccions we should be
ایین نگه داری
what purpose,
glad to be informed for what different from the others, they
were
in a
deckim.
Ming concurred with the Chief Magistrate "by which, in the judgment
ment of dis
reellency, the Lvious intent and
meaning of the Law were
by
abrogated
"and annulled by the rction of the "Bench" that
again,
น
the 2nd [32]
of Inne, certain of the Justices "Supported the reting Chiep lagistrate
"in his determination not to give effect to the Law," and "cooperated with him in his extrandinary
• Those statements "cource of procceding":"
i
4
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.